🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.